Prines v. Berryhill, 2:16-cv-01457-JCM-PAL. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170524c49
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 23, 2017
Latest Update: May 23, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM. (First Request) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Matt G. Prines (Plaintiff) and Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner), stipulate, with the approval of this Court, to an extension of time for the Commissioner to file her Cross-Motion To Affirm by thirty days from May 17, 2017 to June 16, 2017, with all other dates in this Court's Scheduling Order
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM. (First Request) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Matt G. Prines (Plaintiff) and Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner), stipulate, with the approval of this Court, to an extension of time for the Commissioner to file her Cross-Motion To Affirm by thirty days from May 17, 2017 to June 16, 2017, with all other dates in this Court's Scheduling Order e..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM.
(First Request)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Matt G. Prines (Plaintiff) and Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner), stipulate, with the approval of this Court, to an extension of time for the Commissioner to file her Cross-Motion To Affirm by thirty days from May 17, 2017 to June 16, 2017, with all other dates in this Court's Scheduling Order extended accordingly. This is the Commissioner's first request for an extension.
There is good cause because, since Plaintiff filed his Motion For Reversal And/Or Remand (Plaintiff's Motion), counsel has been handling a large number of District Court cases in addition to this one, with two briefs due this week and a dispositive motion in an employment law case due today. Additionally, the Commissioner's counsel was out of the office on approved leave for nearly two weeks this month. Further, counsel has had numerous other deadlines in the past month, including other District Court briefs, a settlement memorandum, and other motions in an administrative matter. As a result, the Commissioner needs additional time to properly respond to the issues Plaintiff raised in his Motion. Plaintiff has no objection.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this case by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
