Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. T-Shack, Inc., 2:16-cv-02664-JCM-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170608b89 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . COME NOW the parties, and hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, due to Defendant's counsel, LUIS A. AYON, ESQ., of AYON LAW, PLLC being recently retained to represent the interests of Defendant, T-SHACK, INC., a Nevada corporation, ("T-SHACK"), Defendant is unable to meet the deadline of May 24, 2017 for
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request)

COME NOW the parties, and hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, due to Defendant's counsel, LUIS A. AYON, ESQ., of AYON LAW, PLLC being recently retained to represent the interests of Defendant, T-SHACK, INC., a Nevada corporation, ("T-SHACK"), Defendant is unable to meet the deadline of May 24, 2017 for filing of their opposition to Plaintiff, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO BANK'S ("FEDERAL/WELLS") Motion for Summary Judgment filed and served on April 19, 2017 in this matter.

THEREFORE, the parties agree that Defendant T-SHACK'S opposition to Plaintiff FEDERAL/WELLS'S Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and served no later than June 7, 2017.

The Plaintiff, FEDERAL/WELLS' reply to Defendant T-SHACK'S opposition will be filed and served no later than June 30, 2017.

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1(a) and 7-1, the parties state the reason for extending the briefing deadline is to enable counsel for Defendant T-SHACK more time to evaluate and brief the issues raised in Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This is this Defendant T-SHACK'S second request for an extension of time to brief the Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties have entered into this agreement in good faith and not for purposes of delay. This is the parties' way of accommodating one another given the overall increase in litigation in their areas of law practice.

ORDER

Having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Defendant T-SHACK'S opposition to Plaintiff FEDERAL/WELL'S Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and served no later than June 7, 2017;

Plaintiff FEDERAL/WELL'S reply to Defendant T-SHACK'S opposition will be filed no later than June 30, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer