DOE v. BARRAZA-BALCAZAR, 2:16-cv-01696-JAD-PAL. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170609f11
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . COME NOW the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant Clark County School District may have up to and including June 23, 2017, to file its reply in support of motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 26). Plaintiff's response was filed May 24, 2017 (Docket No. 36)
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . COME NOW the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant Clark County School District may have up to and including June 23, 2017, to file its reply in support of motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 26). Plaintiff's response was filed May 24, 2017 (Docket No. 36)...
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Second Request)
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
COME NOW the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant Clark County School District may have up to and including June 23, 2017, to file its reply in support of motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 26). Plaintiff's response was filed May 24, 2017 (Docket No. 36). The parties previously stipulated that the District would have to June 16, 2017, to file its reply. Docket No. 35.
At the time filing the previous stipulation, defense counsel forgot that the District's legal office is moving on June 9th. Defense counsel must have his office packed by the end of June 8th and the move, including computers, is to take place on June 9th and through the weekend. It is expected that it will be into the week of June 12th before the move is complete. Additionally defense counsel has had depositions set in another matter that should take all day on June 12th and 14th which were not scheduled at the time of the earlier stipulation. Because of these unanticipated events, the parties have agreed to this week extension for the District's reply brief.
Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the District be allowed up to and including June 23, 2017, to file its reply in support of the motion for summary judgment filed as Docket No. 26.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle