GARCIA v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170619b55
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONSIDER MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS (ECF No. 32) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The plaintiffs have filed an emergency motion for reconsideration of my order denying the motion to remand this case to state court. ECF No. 32. The plaintiffs have not identified an emergency that justifies expedited treatment. Moreover, the plaintiffs have not complied with Local Rule 7-4 regarding emergency motions because they have not accompanied the moti
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONSIDER MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS (ECF No. 32) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The plaintiffs have filed an emergency motion for reconsideration of my order denying the motion to remand this case to state court. ECF No. 32. The plaintiffs have not identified an emergency that justifies expedited treatment. Moreover, the plaintiffs have not complied with Local Rule 7-4 regarding emergency motions because they have not accompanied the motio..
More
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONSIDER MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS
(ECF No. 32)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have filed an emergency motion for reconsideration of my order denying the motion to remand this case to state court. ECF No. 32. The plaintiffs have not identified an emergency that justifies expedited treatment. Moreover, the plaintiffs have not complied with Local Rule 7-4 regarding emergency motions because they have not accompanied the motion with a declaration containing the information required by Local Rule 7-4(a).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that I will not address the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration on an emergency basis. The motion will be briefed and resolved in the ordinary course.
Source: Leagle
