Filed: Jun. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW Petitioner, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, and Respondent, LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On March 31, 2017, Petitioner filed the instant action, which seeks to enforce an administrative subpoena served upon Respondent. 2. On May 31, 2017, Respondent filed an Objection to the instant Petition, together with a Motion to Quash. 3.
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW Petitioner, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, and Respondent, LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On March 31, 2017, Petitioner filed the instant action, which seeks to enforce an administrative subpoena served upon Respondent. 2. On May 31, 2017, Respondent filed an Objection to the instant Petition, together with a Motion to Quash. 3. O..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
(First Request)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
COMES NOW Petitioner, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, and Respondent, LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On March 31, 2017, Petitioner filed the instant action, which seeks to enforce an administrative subpoena served upon Respondent.
2. On May 31, 2017, Respondent filed an Objection to the instant Petition, together with a Motion to Quash.
3. On June 14, 2017, Petitioner filed a Response to the Respondent's Motion to Quash, as well as a Cross-Motion for an Order Requiring Respondent to Comply with the Subpoena.
4. The deadline for Respondent's Reply in support of its Motion to Quash is presently June 21, 2017, while the deadline for its Response to Petitioner's Cross-Motion is presently June 28, 2017.
5. Respondent's counsel has been required to devote time and attention to numerous other pending legal matters which has detracted from the time available to prepare the subject Reply and Response. Moreover, the consolidation of the matters will result in judicial economy.
6. The deadline for both Respondent's Reply in support of its Motion to Quash and its Response to Petitioner's Cross-Motion shall be extended until July 3, 2017.
7. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
