The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust v. Mohave Restoration, Inc., 2:16-cv-01190-JAD-CWH. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170628f39
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER ECF No. 34 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiffs, The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust; The Board of Trustees of The Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust; The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust; The Board of Trustees of Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants, Moha
Summary: ORDER ECF No. 34 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiffs, The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust; The Board of Trustees of The Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust; The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust; The Board of Trustees of Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants, Mohav..
More
ORDER
ECF No. 34
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among Plaintiffs, The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust; The Board of Trustees of The Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust; The Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust; The Board of Trustees of Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants, Mohave Restoration, Inc. dba Service Masters 1st Response, a foreign corporation, and Jeremiah L. Cox, an individual, and Defendant Hanover Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Insurance Company ("Hanover"), and subject to the approval and Order of the Court, as follows:
1. A full and final settlement has been agreed upon regarding Plaintiffs' claims against Hanover. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, Plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their claims against Hanover with prejudice.
2. The terms of the settlement agreement have been satisfied; therefore, the parties stipulate and agree in requesting that Hanover be dismissed from this action with prejudice.
3. This Stipulation for Dismissal applies only to Plaintiffs' claims against Hanover, and is of no effect regarding Hanover's Cross Claims or Third Party Claims, which remain pending, nor Plaintiffs' claims against the other Defendants, which also remain pending.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 34] and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Hanover Insurance Company are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. This dismissal does not terminate Hanover as a party, because Hanover continues to prosecute third-party claims.
Source: Leagle
