Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SADRI v. MANDALAY CORP., 2:17-cv-01400-RFB-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170710c53 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1, Plaintiff MALEK ARDALAN SADRI ("Plaintiff") and Defendant MANDALAY CORP. dba MANDALAY BAY RESORT ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective undersigned counsels hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismis
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1, Plaintiff MALEK ARDALAN SADRI ("Plaintiff") and Defendant MANDALAY CORP. dba MANDALAY BAY RESORT ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective undersigned counsels hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) up to and including July 20, 2017.

This is the Parties' first request to extend the time for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss. This request is made to allow Plaintiff's counsel additional time to confer with plaintiff on certain issues including engaging in meaningful settlement negotiations and avoid the possibility of trial and lengthy discovery. This requested extension of time is sought in good faith and not for purposes of causing any undue delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer