TDN Money Systems, Inc. v. Everi Payments Inc., 2:15-cv-02197-JCM-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170713e31
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTIONS IN LIMINE (FIRST REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff TDN Money Systems, Inc. ("TDN"), and Defendant Everi Payment Inc. f/k/a Global Cash Access, Inc. ("GCA"), (referred to collectively as "Parties" and individually as "Party") by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby Stipulate and Agree, subject to the Court's approval, to extend the deadline to file any motions in limine f
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTIONS IN LIMINE (FIRST REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff TDN Money Systems, Inc. ("TDN"), and Defendant Everi Payment Inc. f/k/a Global Cash Access, Inc. ("GCA"), (referred to collectively as "Parties" and individually as "Party") by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby Stipulate and Agree, subject to the Court's approval, to extend the deadline to file any motions in limine fr..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTIONS IN LIMINE
(FIRST REQUEST)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff TDN Money Systems, Inc. ("TDN"), and Defendant Everi Payment Inc. f/k/a Global Cash Access, Inc. ("GCA"), (referred to collectively as "Parties" and individually as "Party") by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby Stipulate and Agree, subject to the Court's approval, to extend the deadline to file any motions in limine from July 7, 2017 to July 14, 2017.
The Parties have been diligently working on meeting and conferring on respective motions in limine, but due to conflicting deadlines and schedules the Parties request a slight seven (7) day extension to finalize and file any motions in limine. This slight extension of time will still require motions in limine to be filed 30 days before trial as set forth in LR 16-3.
This is the first request for an extension and is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle