Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CECICH v. CHASE MORTGAGE, 2:17-cv-01435-RFB-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170721c19 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST REQUEST CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Mark S. Cecich ("Plaintiff"), through his attorneys, Haines & Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Card Services ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows: Plaintiff filed his Amended Comp
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT

FIRST REQUEST

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Mark S. Cecich ("Plaintiff"), through his attorneys, Haines & Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Card Services ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:

Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint on July 6, 2017 [Docket No. 8]. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Wells Fargo requests, and Plaintiff agrees, that Wells Fargo shall have until July 28, 2017, to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so that the parties may discuss settlement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint shall be extended to on or before July 28, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer