Filed: Jul. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Service by Publication of Defendant Olesya Sidorkina (ECF No 32), filed on July 17, 2017. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e), the state statutes in which the District Court is held are followed in matters pertaining to service of summons by publication. N.R.C.P. 4(e)(1)(i) states that the court may permit service by publication if, after due diligence shown, the plaintiff is unable to find
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Service by Publication of Defendant Olesya Sidorkina (ECF No 32), filed on July 17, 2017. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e), the state statutes in which the District Court is held are followed in matters pertaining to service of summons by publication. N.R.C.P. 4(e)(1)(i) states that the court may permit service by publication if, after due diligence shown, the plaintiff is unable to find ..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Service by Publication of Defendant Olesya Sidorkina (ECF No 32), filed on July 17, 2017.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e), the state statutes in which the District Court is held are followed in matters pertaining to service of summons by publication. N.R.C.P. 4(e)(1)(i) states that the court may permit service by publication if, after due diligence shown, the plaintiff is unable to find the defendant(s) within the state, or they are avoiding the service of summons. The plaintiff must prove this to the satisfaction of the court either by affidavit or by a verified complaint. The Nevada Supreme Court has held that there is no objective, formulaic standard for determining what is, or is not, due diligence. Abreu v. Gilmer, 985 P.2d 746, 749 (1999). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and LR 26-4, extensions of time may be granted for good cause shown.
Plaintiff requests permission to serve Defendant Olesya Sidorkina by publication. Plaintiff represents that it demonstrated due diligence by making several attempts to serve Defendant. The Court, therefore, finds that Plaintiff has provided sufficient good cause to warrant service by publication and will grant Plaintiff until September 19, 2017 to effectuate service. Accordingly,. . .
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Service by Publication of Defendant Olesya Sidorkina (ECF No 32) is granted. Plaintiff shall have until September 19, 2017 to effectuate service on Defendant Olesya Sidorkina. Defendant may be served through publication of the summons and Complaint in this case at least once a week for four (4) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation.