Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Guild Mortgage Company v. Prestwick Court Trust, 2:15-cv-00258-JCM-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170802c69 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant, Canyon Crest Master Association ("HOA"), Defendant, Prestwick Court Trust ("Prestwick"), and Plaintiff, Guild Mortgage Company ("GMC") hereby stipulate to extend the dispositive motions deadline for sixty (60) days due to the substitution of HOA's counsel on April 27, 2017. This is the parties' first request to extend the dispositive motions deadline. I. FACTUAL BA
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE

(First Request)

Defendant, Canyon Crest Master Association ("HOA"), Defendant, Prestwick Court Trust ("Prestwick"), and Plaintiff, Guild Mortgage Company ("GMC") hereby stipulate to extend the dispositive motions deadline for sixty (60) days due to the substitution of HOA's counsel on April 27, 2017.

This is the parties' first request to extend the dispositive motions deadline.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On February 12, 2015, GMC filed its complaint against HOA and Prestwick for quiet title and declaratory relief. [ECF No. 1]. On April 27, 2017, the Court entered an order granting HOA's Motion to Substitute Attorney, in which Christopher B. Anthony, Esq. of the law firm of Boyack, Orme & Anthony became HOA's attorney of record.

II. DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE

1. GMC, HOA, and Prestwick all produced their initial disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26. 2. All parties have responded to written discovery. 3. FRCP 30(b)(6) Witness for Alessi & Koenig, LLC was deposed. 4. FRCP 30(b)(6) Witness for HOA was deposed. 5. FRCP 30(b)(6) Witness for Prestwick was deposed. 6. GMC disclosed its expert appraiser. 7. Prestwick disclosed its expert appraiser.

III. DISCOVERY REMAINING TO BE COMPLETED

None.

IV. REASONS AND GOOD CAUSE TO EXTEND DEADLINE

To establish good cause, one must show the party cannot reasonably meet the deadlines despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension. See Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1294-95 (9th Cir. 2000); Mendez v. Fiesta Del Norte Home Owners Ass'n, No. 2:15cv-314-RCJ-NJK, 2016 WL 1643780, at *3 (D. Nev. Apr. 26, 2016).

On April 27, 2017, the Court entered an order granting HOA's Motion to Substitute Attorney, thereby appointing the law firm of Boyack Orme & Anthony as HOA's counsel of record. The HOA was previously represented by Alessi & Koenig, LLC, which has thus far not complied with the HOA's request for discovery and other documents issued prior to new counsel's retention. Accordingly, the HOA requests additional time, such that it may obtain such prior discovery and submit motion practice supported by all applicable evidence. Therefore, good cause exists to extend the dispositive motion deadline, currently set on July 17, 2017, by sixty (60) days to September 15, 2017.

V. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR CONDUCTING REMAINING DISCOVERY

a. Initial expert disclosures: NO EXTENSION REQUESTED b. Rebuttal expert disclosures: NO EXTENSION REQUESTED c. Motions to amend pleadings/parties: NO EXTENSION REQUESTED d. Discovery cutoff: NO EXTENSION REQUESTED e. Deadline to file dispositive motions: September 15, 2017

VI. CURRENT TRIAL DATE

No trial date has been set.

VII. CONCLUSION

Dated this 14th day of July, 2017.

The parties believe good cause exists to extend the dispositive motion deadline.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer