Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOBO v. CLARK COUNTY COLLECTION SERVICE, LLC, 2:16-cv-02911-APG-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170818963 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENT (ECF Nos. 5, 18 ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Clark County Collection Service, LLC moved for summary judgment in January 2017. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff Jamilah Bobo filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental response to that motion. ECF No. 18. The parties since have completed discovery. ECF No. 40. Defendant Clark County Collection Service, LLC has filed an amended motion for summary
More

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENT

(ECF Nos. 5, 18

Defendant Clark County Collection Service, LLC moved for summary judgment in January 2017. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff Jamilah Bobo filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental response to that motion. ECF No. 18. The parties since have completed discovery. ECF No. 40. Defendant Clark County Collection Service, LLC has filed an amended motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 50. I deny the original motions as moot because the parties are in the process of briefing summary judgment on a more fulsome evidentiary record following the close of discovery. I therefore will consider the parties' arguments in relation to the later motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Clark County Collection Service, LLC's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 5) is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Jamilah Bobo's motion for leave to file a supplement (ECF No. 18) is DENIED without prejudice as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer