PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST v. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR, 2:17-cv-01790. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170822b80
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR and PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR filed its Motion to Dismiss on July 31, 2017 [ECF No. 8]. 2. PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE
Summary: ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR and PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR filed its Motion to Dismiss on July 31, 2017 [ECF No. 8]. 2. PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE ..
More
ORDER
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR and PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR filed its Motion to Dismiss on July 31, 2017 [ECF No. 8].
2. PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE filed its Opposition to Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6425 Extreme Shear's Motion to Dismiss on August 14, 2017 [ECF No. 12].
3. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss is due August 21, 2017.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6425 EXTREME SHEAR will have an additional seven (7) days to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss which will make it due August 28, 2017.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
