Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

STATH v. WELLS FARGO, N.A., 2:17-cv-02163-RFB-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170823b51 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EQUIFAX EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FIRST REQUEST CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Michael J. Stath ("Plaintiff"), through his attorneys, Payne Law Firm LLC, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows: Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 11, 2017 [Docket No. 1].
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EQUIFAX EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

FIRST REQUEST

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Michael J. Stath ("Plaintiff"), through his attorneys, Payne Law Firm LLC, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., ("Wells Fargo"), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 11, 2017 [Docket No. 1]. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Wells Fargo requests, and Plaintiff agree, that Wells Fargo shall have until September 22, 2017, to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so that the parties may discuss settlement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to on or before September 22, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer