Filed: Aug. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . Plaintiffs, Douglas Stacey, Shellie Stacey, and Jeniece Valley, and Defendant Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC ( Carrington ), hereby stipulate and agree that Carrington shall have an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including August 31, 2017, to file its response to the plaintiff's complaint, which was due on August 15, 2017. Carrington was not aware its respon
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . Plaintiffs, Douglas Stacey, Shellie Stacey, and Jeniece Valley, and Defendant Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC ( Carrington ), hereby stipulate and agree that Carrington shall have an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including August 31, 2017, to file its response to the plaintiff's complaint, which was due on August 15, 2017. Carrington was not aware its respons..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Douglas Stacey, Shellie Stacey, and Jeniece Valley, and Defendant Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC (Carrington), hereby stipulate and agree that Carrington shall have an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including August 31, 2017, to file its response to the plaintiff's complaint, which was due on August 15, 2017.
Carrington was not aware its response was due on August 15, 2017, because of a calendaring error. This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
