Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHAMARIA v. DIAB, 2:17-CV-02023-JAD-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170829c05 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT FOLLOWING REMOVAL CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT (DKT. 3) (First Request) Plaintiffs VISHAL CHAMARIA, VIVEK CHAMARIA, PUJA CHARMARIA, GAURI CHAMARIA, P & V, LLC, and CHIP SHOP, LLC (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants MATTHEW GREGORY JONES and G & M MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Tony M. Diab, and Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., hereby enter into this
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT FOLLOWING REMOVAL

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT (DKT. 3) (First Request)

Plaintiffs VISHAL CHAMARIA, VIVEK CHAMARIA, PUJA CHARMARIA, GAURI CHAMARIA, P & V, LLC, and CHIP SHOP, LLC (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants MATTHEW GREGORY JONES and G & M MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Tony M. Diab, and Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., hereby enter into this Stipulation to Extend Time to file Joint Status Report Following Removal (Dkt. 3) (First Request) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and L.R. IA 6-1 as follows:

WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Mr. Diab filed Defendant Tony M. Diab's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities Thereon (the "Diab Motion to Dismiss") (Dkt. 10);

WHEREAS on August 8, 2017, Defendants Matthew Gregory Jones and G & M Management Services, Inc. (the "Jones Defendants") filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Complaint Against Defendants Matthew Gregory Jones and G & M Management Services, Inc. for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (the "Jones Defendants' Motion to Dismiss") (Dkt. 20);

WHEREAS Plaintiffs' response to these respective motions has been extended until and including August 30, 2017 by stipulation of the parties and order of this Court (Dkt. 31; 32);

WHEREAS the parties agree that jurisdiction is a threshold issue the resolution of which may alter the scope of this action and thereby affect the content of a status report that includes a statement of action to be taken by this Court;

WHEREAS the parties believe that an eight day extension of the deadline to file a Joint Status Report will not unduly delay the resolution of this matter;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to allow the parties until and including September 14, 2017 to file a Joint Status Report pursuant to this Court's July 26, 2017 order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer