Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC. v. PIMA VILLAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, 2:17-cv-01243-JAD-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170905970 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC'S COMPLAINT (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant PIMA VILLAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION ("HOA"), and Plaintiff NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC., by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the deadline for HOA to Respond to Plaintiff NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC.'S Complaint shall be extended to August 7, 20
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC'S COMPLAINT

(First Request)

Defendant PIMA VILLAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION ("HOA"), and Plaintiff NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC., by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the deadline for HOA to Respond to Plaintiff NOMURA CREDIT AND CAPITAL, INC.'S Complaint shall be extended to August 7, 2017. The HOA's Response was originally due on July 6, 2017, however, counsel has just recently been retained in this matter and requires additional time to analyze Plaintiff's claims.

This is the HOA's first request for an extension of these deadlines and is not intended for the purposes of prejudice or delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer