Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. PETROIU, 2:11-CR-434-LDG-(PAL). (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170905f92 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2017
Summary: Stipulated Motion to Continue Discovery (Eighth Request) LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . COME NOW the parties and stipulate and jointly move this Court to continue the discovery cut-off in the above-captioned case until September 30, 2017. This is the parties' eighth stipulated request for an extension of time. This Court granted a 30-day extension on June 29, 2017. After conducting extensive discovery, the parties have engaged in negotiations and have agreed, in principle, and in an u
More

Stipulated Motion to Continue Discovery

(Eighth Request)

COME NOW the parties and stipulate and jointly move this Court to continue the discovery cut-off in the above-captioned case until September 30, 2017. This is the parties' eighth stipulated request for an extension of time. This Court granted a 30-day extension on June 29, 2017.

After conducting extensive discovery, the parties have engaged in negotiations and have agreed, in principle, and in an unsigned writing, to settle this matter for an agreed amount. One of the claimants in this matter, Atanas Nedyalkov, is on the road as a long-range trucker and cannot sign the settlement agreement until he returns. In the meantime, the parties have an obligation to file a settlement agreement with this Court by August 31, 2017. Government counsel has already reduced the terms of the settlement to writing and has delivered that written agreement to Claimants' counsel for Claimant's execution; and they have agreed to settlement on the terms outlined in that agreement.

Once Mr. Nedyalkov has returned to the city, both he and his wife (Mariya Nedyalkova, the other petitioner) will sign the settlement agreement, which will then be presented to this Court for final action and final disposition of this matter.

Claimants' counsel, Boris Avramski, has consented to this motion for extension of time.

Given the foregoing, the parties have agreed to request that this Court extend the discovery cut-off deadline in this matter until September 30, 2017.

This motion is not submitted solely for the purpose of delay or for any other improper purpose.

WHEREFORE, the parties move this Court to grant a continuance of the discovery cutoff date until September 30, 2017, for the parties to formally finalize the terms of settlement of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer