ALEXANDER v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 2:17-cv-00139-APG-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170906h36
Filed: Sep. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 60) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the motion to seal filed in relation to Plaintiff's motion to compel. Docket No. 60. The parties dispute whether the underlying information warrants secrecy. Compare Docket No. 60 with Docket No. 63. Concurrently herewith, the Court is denying without prejudice the underlying motion to compel. As the Court is not definitively resolving that underlying motion, the Court will STRIKE the materials curr
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 60) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the motion to seal filed in relation to Plaintiff's motion to compel. Docket No. 60. The parties dispute whether the underlying information warrants secrecy. Compare Docket No. 60 with Docket No. 63. Concurrently herewith, the Court is denying without prejudice the underlying motion to compel. As the Court is not definitively resolving that underlying motion, the Court will STRIKE the materials curre..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 60)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the motion to seal filed in relation to Plaintiff's motion to compel. Docket No. 60. The parties dispute whether the underlying information warrants secrecy. Compare Docket No. 60 with Docket No. 63. Concurrently herewith, the Court is denying without prejudice the underlying motion to compel. As the Court is not definitively resolving that underlying motion, the Court will STRIKE the materials currently filed under seal (Docket No. 59), and will DENY as moot the motion to seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
