Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

EDALATDJU v. AMERICAN INVSCO CORPORATION, 2:12-cv-01104-APG-NJK (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170911597 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT REBEKAH DESMET'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed between Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, MICHAEL R. MUSHKIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., and Defendant Rebekah DeSmet, by and through her counsel of record, Kristina S. Holman, that Defendant DeSmet shall have up to and including Thursday, August 17, 2017, to file her Motion for Summary Judgment, which was originally due o
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT REBEKAH DESMET'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed between Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel, MICHAEL R. MUSHKIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C., and Defendant Rebekah DeSmet, by and through her counsel of record, Kristina S. Holman, that Defendant DeSmet shall have up to and including Thursday, August 17, 2017, to file her Motion for Summary Judgment, which was originally due on Thursday August 10, 2017, per the Court's Minutes of Proceedings dated July 21, 2017.

The reason for this extension is health issues with a family member and a recent discharge from the hospital requiring care giver duties. Ms. Holman contacted opposing counsel's office and was advised of their agreement to this extension of time. However, opposing counsel was not available to review or sign the stipulation until today.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer