JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. SATICOY BAY, LLC SERIES 7612 CRUZ BAY, 2:17-cv-00886-MMD-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170911600
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (" Plaintiff "), Defendant Desert Shores Community Association (the " Association "), and Defendant Saticoy Bay, LLC Series 7612 Cruz Bay (" Saticoy "), by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff shall have up to, and including, August 21, 2017 to file r
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (" Plaintiff "), Defendant Desert Shores Community Association (the " Association "), and Defendant Saticoy Bay, LLC Series 7612 Cruz Bay (" Saticoy "), by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff shall have up to, and including, August 21, 2017 to file re..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), Defendant Desert Shores Community Association (the "Association"), and Defendant Saticoy Bay, LLC Series 7612 Cruz Bay ("Saticoy"), by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff shall have up to, and including, August 21, 2017 to file replies in support of its Countermotion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) that was filed on July 10, 2017. This is the first stipulation for extension of time to reply in support of the Countermotion for Summary Judgment.
The reason for the extension of time is that Plaintiff's client contact is on a business trip and unavailable for the week immediately prior to the Monday due date. Also, Plaintiff's counsel is traveling the week prior to the due date. As such, the parties have stipulated to the above extension.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
