WESTGATE LVH, LLC v. TRUSTEES OF THE NEVADA RESORT ASSOCIATION, 2:17-cv-01731-RFB-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170921577
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY STAY NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order requesting special scheduling. Docket No. 14. The presumptive discovery cut-off deadline is 180 days after the Defendant's first appearance, unless the parties state reasons why longer or different time periods should apply. Local Rule 26-1. In this case, the parties have set September 8, 2017 as the starting date to calcul
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY STAY NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order requesting special scheduling. Docket No. 14. The presumptive discovery cut-off deadline is 180 days after the Defendant's first appearance, unless the parties state reasons why longer or different time periods should apply. Local Rule 26-1. In this case, the parties have set September 8, 2017 as the starting date to calcula..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY STAY
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order requesting special scheduling. Docket No. 14. The presumptive discovery cut-off deadline is 180 days after the Defendant's first appearance, unless the parties state reasons why longer or different time periods should apply. Local Rule 26-1. In this case, the parties have set September 8, 2017 as the starting date to calculate the discovery cut-off deadline. Docket No. 14 at 2. The parties submit that, during the time period after the meet and confer on August 17, 2017, they were preparing their joint discovery plan and discussing protective orders. Id. at 5. The Court finds this reason insufficient for an extended discovery period, particularly considering that the parties have failed to account for the time period between July 20, 2017, and August 17, 2017.
Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES without prejudice the stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order requesting special scheduling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
