DAVIS v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, 2:17-cv-02488-JCM-NJK. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171005i25
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 11) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is an amended discovery plan. Docket No. 11. The Court denied the parties' initial discovery plan because, inter alia, "the discovery plan fails to provide the certifications required by Local Rules 26-1(b)(7), (8), and (9)." Docket No. 10. In violation of the Court's order and the local rules, the amended discovery plan suffers the same deficiency. Accordingly, the amended discovery plan is DENIED witho
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 11) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is an amended discovery plan. Docket No. 11. The Court denied the parties' initial discovery plan because, inter alia, "the discovery plan fails to provide the certifications required by Local Rules 26-1(b)(7), (8), and (9)." Docket No. 10. In violation of the Court's order and the local rules, the amended discovery plan suffers the same deficiency. Accordingly, the amended discovery plan is DENIED withou..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 11)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is an amended discovery plan. Docket No. 11. The Court denied the parties' initial discovery plan because, inter alia, "the discovery plan fails to provide the certifications required by Local Rules 26-1(b)(7), (8), and (9)." Docket No. 10. In violation of the Court's order and the local rules, the amended discovery plan suffers the same deficiency. Accordingly, the amended discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. A second amended discovery plan shall be filed by October 6, 2017. Counsel shall ensure that the second amended discovery plan complies with all requirements outlined in the local rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
