Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SIELAW v. ALLY FINANCIAL, 2:17-cv-02045-APG-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171006z37 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT TRANS UNION LLC'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . COME NOW Plaintiff Virginia Sielaw ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Trans Union LLC ("Trans Union"), by and through their respective counsel, and file their Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans Union's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. On August 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint. The current deadline
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT TRANS UNION LLC'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

COME NOW Plaintiff Virginia Sielaw ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Trans Union LLC ("Trans Union"), by and through their respective counsel, and file their Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans Union's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. On August 28, 2017, Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint. The current deadline for Trans Union to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is October 6, 2017. Trans Union is in need of additional time to investigate Plaintiff's claims and respond to the allegations and details in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Plaintiff has agreed to extend the deadline in which Trans Union has to file responsive pleadings to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until November 6, 2017.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Trans Union to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer