Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Federal National Mortgage Association v. Monaco Landscape Maintenance Association, Inc., 2:16-cv-02980-JCM-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171011f59 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiffs Federal Natonal Mortgage Association ( Fannie Mae ) and Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP ( BANA ), defendant Monaco Landscape Maintenance Association, Inc. ( Monaco ), and defendant Inception Investments, LLC ( Inception ), respectfully submit the following stipul
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(First Request)

Plaintiffs Federal Natonal Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (BANA), defendant Monaco Landscape Maintenance Association, Inc. (Monaco), and defendant Inception Investments, LLC (Inception), respectfully submit the following stipulation and order to allow Plaintiffs fourteen (14) additional days to file their response to Moncao's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 33) and allow Monaco and Inception fourteen (14) additional days to file their responses to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 32).

Plaintiffs filed their motion for summary judgment on September 15, 2017. (ECF No. 32.) Monaco and Inception's deadline to file their responses to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is October 6 2017. Monaco filed its motion for summary judgment on September 15, 2017. (ECF No. 33.) Plaintiffs' deadline to file their response to Monaco's motion for summary judgment is October 6 2017. The parties stipulate to extending their respective deadlines by fourteen (14) additional days, to October 20, 2017, to allow the parties' additional time to prepare their responses. This is the parties' first request for an extension of this deadline and is not being made for the purpose of dely.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer