Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bank of America, N.A. v. Santa Barbara Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-02768-MMD-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171012g91 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO STAY ALL DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 58] (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (" BANA ") and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION'S (" Fannie Mae "), Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cros
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO STAY ALL DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 58]

(First Request)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ("BANA") and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION'S ("Fannie Mae"), Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant, SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC ("SFR"), Defendant Absolute Collection Services, LLC ("Absolute") and Defendant SANTA BARBARA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ("Association") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to allow defendants an additional week until October 13, 2017 to file any response to Plaintiffs BANA's and Fannie Mae's Motion to Stay All Discovery Pending Resolution of Pending Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 58] ("Motion to Stay"), which is currently due on October 6, 2017. SFR seeks the instant extension because it needs additional time to review the motion and to develop its response. In addition, the Parties agree that Plaintiffs BANA and Fannie Mae shall have until October 27, 2017 to file any reply in support of their Motion to Stay.

This is the first request for an enlargement of time of the subject deadlines. The Parties stipulate to the foregoing in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer