Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. JAMES, 2:17-cr-00180-JAD-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171027h64 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS (ECF No. 203) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney; and Cristina D. Silva, Assistant United States Attorneys, counsel for the United States of America, and Christopher Oram, Esq., counsel for defendant EVERLY JAMES, for the reasons set forth herein, that the Government's response to defendant's motion to suppress (ECF
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS (ECF No. 203)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Steven W. Myhre, Acting United States Attorney; and Cristina D. Silva, Assistant United States Attorneys, counsel for the United States of America, and Christopher Oram, Esq., counsel for defendant EVERLY JAMES, for the reasons set forth herein, that the Government's response to defendant's motion to suppress (ECF No. 203), currently due on October 19, 2017, be continued for six weeks for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the Government advised the Defendant that there is additional evidence that could extend the currently charged conspiracy. Counsel for the Defendant would like to see that additional discovery so the parties can potentially engage in plea negotiations. The Government is currently producing that additional information to the Defendant and his Counsel.

2. Further, Defendant's counsel set scheduled to commence a first-degree murder trial in the State of Nevada in the next two weeks. The trial will limit counsel's availability to file a reply to the Government's response.

3. The defendant is in custody and but does not object to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice because it will prevent the Defendant from receiving and reviewing additional information with his counsel, and his counsel the opportunity to file a fulsome reply to the Government's response.

5. This is the first request for continue the response to the motion to suppress.

ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for the Government advised the Defendant that there is additional evidence that could expand the currently charged conspiracy. Counsel for the Defendant would like to see that additional discovery so the parties can potentially engage in plea negotiations. The Government is currently producing that additional information to the Defendant and his Counsel.

2. Further, Defendant's counsel set scheduled to commence a first-degree murder trial in the State of Nevada in the next two weeks. The trial will limit counsel's availability to file a reply to the Government's response.

3. The defendant is in custody and but does not object to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice because it will prevent the Defendant from receiving and reviewing additional information with his counsel, and his counsel the opportunity to file a fulsome reply to the Government's response.

5. This is the first request for continue the response to the motion to suppress.

For all of the above-stated reasons, the end of justice would best be served by a six-week continuation of the deadline for the Government to file its response to the Defendant's Motion to Suppress (ECF No. 203).

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the Government's deadline to respond to the Defendant's motion to suppress, currently scheduled for October 19, 2017, be vacated and continued to November 30, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer