Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank of America, N.A. v. Bailey, 2:14-cv-885-JCM-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171030e23 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PRETRIAL ORDER (NINTH DISCOVERY DEADLINE REQUEST) GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Samuel R. Bailey ("Defendant") by and through the law firm of Schwartz Flansburg PLLC and Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. ("Plaintiff") by and through the law firm of Holley Driggs Walch Fine Wray Puzey & Thompson (Defendant and Plaintiff collectively "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to file the Pretrial Order which
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE PRETRIAL ORDER (NINTH DISCOVERY DEADLINE REQUEST)

Defendant Samuel R. Bailey ("Defendant") by and through the law firm of Schwartz Flansburg PLLC and Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. ("Plaintiff") by and through the law firm of Holley Driggs Walch Fine Wray Puzey & Thompson (Defendant and Plaintiff collectively "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to file the Pretrial Order which is currently due on October 21, 2017 as follows:

Based on the following, the Parties hereto respectfully request an extension to file the Pretrial Order to be continued for 30 days, as follows:

1. The Parties stipulated to new deadlines on August 5, 2016 (ECF No. 64).

2. Thereafter, the Parties attended a Mediation at which some of the claims were resolved.

3. Between Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BANA and Defendant/Counterclaimant Bailey, the case was not resolved.

4. Following the Mediation, Defendant/Counterclaimant Bailey took the deposition of the 30(b)(6) designee for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BANA. The date for the 30(b)(6) deposition had been set prior to Mediation and was set forth and contemplated in the August 5, 2016 discovery stipulation (EFC No. 64).

5. Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BANA filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 14, 2016 (ECF No. 68).

6. Defendant/Counterclaimant Bailey filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 31, 2016 (ECF No. 70).

7. On June 22, 2017, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff/Counterdefendant BANA's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76).

8. On June 22, 2017, the Court denied Defendant/Counterclaimant Bailey's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 76).

9. On July 19, 2017, BANA filed a Motion to Bifurcate Trial (ECF No. 77).

10. On August 2, 2017 Bailey filed a Response to Motion to Bifurcate Trial (ECF No. 80).

11. On August 18, 2017, BANA filed a Reply to its Motion to Bifurcate Trial (ECF No. 84).

12. On August 18, 2017, the Court granted a Stipulation to Extend Time to Reply to Motion to Bifurcate (ECF No. 85).

13. On September 21, 2017, the Court denied the Motion to Bifurcate Trial (ECF No. 88).

14. The parties desire a final opportunity to discuss settlement and potentially schedule a mediation.

LR26-4 Statement:

Good cause and/or excusable neglect exist to extend Pretrial Order deadline for the express purpose of exploring a renewed mediation and settlement negotiations between the Parties.

The current deadline to file the Pretrial Order is October 21, 2017 and the Parties request that the deadline to file the Pretrial Order be continued for 30 days.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby ordered as follows that the time to file the Pretrial Order be extended from the current deadline of October 21, 2017 to November 20, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer