Elawyers Elawyers

Bank of America, N.A. v. Solera at Stallion Mountain Unit Owners' Association, 2:16-cv-02339-JCM-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171103c66 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO: FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 68) FILE RESPONSE TO SFR'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 69 and 70) FILE RESPONSE TO SOLERA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 71) (FIRST REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Bank of America, N.A., ( BANA ), Solera at Stallion Mountain Unit Owners' Association ( Solera ) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ( SFR ) stipulate and agree to extend th
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO:

FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 68)

FILE RESPONSE TO SFR'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 69 and 70)

FILE RESPONSE TO SOLERA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 71)

(FIRST REQUEST)

Bank of America, N.A., (BANA), Solera at Stallion Mountain Unit Owners' Association (Solera) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) stipulate and agree to extend the parties' deadlines to file responses to the parties' motions for summary judgment which were all filed on October 9, 2017, as set forth below:

1) BANA's Response to SFR's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 69) shall be extended by two weeks, from October 30, 2017 to November 13, 2017.

2) BANA's response to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 70) shall be extended by two weeks, from October 30, 2017 to November 13, 2017.

3) BANA's response to Solera's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 71) shall be extended by two weeks, from October 30, 2017 to November 13, 2017.

4) SFR and Solera's response to BANA's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 68) shall be extended by two weeks, from October 30, 2017 to November 13, 2017.

The parties request these extensions to be able to have sufficient time to prepare responses due to the numerous filings in this matter that must be addressed. No previous extensions have been requested. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer