Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Teofrio v. Warner, 2:15-cv-01747-JAD-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171106a11 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY AND TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE [ECF NO. 38] (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules ("LR") IA 6-1, Defendants, Richard T. Warner, Jr. ("Warner") and Western Express, Inc. ("Western Express"), and Plaintiff, Tracy Nichole Teofrio ("Teofrio"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 1. On October 10, 2017, Warner and Western Express filed their Motion to Strike Plaintiff's
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY AND TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE [ECF NO. 38]

(First Request)

Pursuant to Local Rules ("LR") IA 6-1, Defendants, Richard T. Warner, Jr. ("Warner") and Western Express, Inc. ("Western Express"), and Plaintiff, Tracy Nichole Teofrio ("Teofrio"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:

1. On October 10, 2017, Warner and Western Express filed their Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Experts [ECF No. 38] (the "Motion").

2. The court scheduled the hearing on the Motion for Monday, November 6, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. See ECF No. 39.

3. Plaintiff opposed the Motion on October 24, 2017 [ECF No. 40], making replies due October 31, 2017.

4. The parties now stipulate to extend the time for Warner and Western Express to file their reply brief to Friday, November 3, 2017.

5. The parties also stipulate to continue the hearing on the Motion to December 1, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 3A.

6. The extension and continuance are necessary because on October 1, 2017, counsel for Warner and Western, Ms. Surur, tragically and unexpectedly lost a very close family member and was, therefore, out of the office from October 1, 2017 through October 26, 2017. Ms. Surur and lead counsel for Warner and Western, Mr. Jaffe, were scheduled to begin a three-week jury trial in another matter on October 23, 2017. This unexpected event required Mr. Jaffe to prepare for and try the case without Ms. Surur. Mr. Jaffe remains in trial through November 6, 2017 and while Ms. Surur has returned to the office, she requires additional time to prepare the reply brief. In addition, Mr. Jaffe will argue the Motion and is not available on November 6, 2017, because he will be in trial. Plaintiff's counsel extended the professional courtesy of stipulating to a brief extension of the reply deadline and to continuing the hearing.

7. There is excusable neglect for submitting this stipulation after the October 31, 2017 deadline to file replies. Defense counsel first reached out to Plaintiff's counsel by email on October 26, 2017, but counsel was unable to connect because Plaintiff's counsel was handling another matter. Counsel spoke on October 30, 2017 and reached this stipulation, but were unable to agree upon a hearing date that worked for all counsel and the court until November 1, 2017. Counsel submitted this stipulation as soon as the new hearing date was obtained.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer