Le v. Zuffa, LLC, 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171117e65
Visitors: 26
Filed: Nov. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER (Mots. to Seal — ECF Nos. 485, 487, 498) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' Motions to Seal (ECF No. 485, 487, 498). These Motions are referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 of the Local Rules of Practice. The Motions seek leave to file under seal certain documents and exhibits referenced in the filings related to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Their Subpoena t
Summary: ORDER (Mots. to Seal — ECF Nos. 485, 487, 498) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' Motions to Seal (ECF No. 485, 487, 498). These Motions are referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 of the Local Rules of Practice. The Motions seek leave to file under seal certain documents and exhibits referenced in the filings related to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Their Subpoena to..
More
ORDER
(Mots. to Seal — ECF Nos. 485, 487, 498)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties' Motions to Seal (ECF No. 485, 487, 498). These Motions are referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 of the Local Rules of Practice.
The Motions seek leave to file under seal certain documents and exhibits referenced in the filings related to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Their Subpoena to Third Party Top Rank, Inc., and Motion to Compel Attendance at Deposition of Robert Arum (ECF No. 470). See Pls.' Sealed Mot. Exhibits (ECF No. 486); Sealed Unredacted Notice of Resolution (ECF No. 499). The parties subsequently reached a resolution of the underlying motion. The parties narrowly tailored their sealing requests to the extent possible by filing redacted versions of the underlying motion as well as the notice of resolution.
Having reviewed and considered the matter in accordance with the Ninth Circuit's directives set forth in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and its progeny, the court finds that the parties have met their burden of establishing good cause for the documents to remain sealed.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The parties' Motions to Seal (ECF No. 485, 487, 498) are GRANTED.
2. Plaintiffs' Sealed Exhibits (ECF No. 486) and Sealed Unredacted Notice of Resolution (ECF No. 499) shall remain under seal.
FootNotes
1. Member Case Nos.: 2:15-cv-01046-RCJ-NJK; 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF; 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF; and 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH.
Source: Leagle
