Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Joseph v. Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC, 2:17-cv-02265. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171121e68 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF MICHELE JOSEPH TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT DESERT ROCK ENTERPRISES II, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff, Michele Joseph ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC ("Desert Rock"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, as set forth below. 1. Plaintiff's response to Desert Rock's Motion to Dismiss [DE #12] was originally d
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF MICHELE JOSEPH TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT DESERT ROCK ENTERPRISES II, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff, Michele Joseph ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC ("Desert Rock"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, as set forth below.

1. Plaintiff's response to Desert Rock's Motion to Dismiss [DE #12] was originally due on November 20, 2017.

2. Plaintiff shall oppose or otherwise respond to the Motion to Dismiss [DE #12] by December 1, 2017.

3. Good cause exists for this brief extension because it is Plaintiff's first request for any extension of time and there are presently no hearings or oral arguments scheduled that would require the Court to vacate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer