Hartbrich v. Johnson, 2:16-cv-01866-APG-VCF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171122h36
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 15) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The defendants move to dismiss because the plaintiff has not exhausted his administrative remedies. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff Uwe Manfred Hartbrich did not respond. I therefore grant the motion as unopposed. LR 7-2(d). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. The amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
(ECF No. 15)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
The defendants move to dismiss because the plaintiff has not exhausted his administrative remedies. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff Uwe Manfred Hartbrich did not respond. I therefore grant the motion as unopposed. LR 7-2(d).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED. The amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.
Source: Leagle
