Tyson v. Boxing Hall of Fame, Inc., 2:17-cv-02122-RFB-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171129d86
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Second Request] GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties as follows:. 1. Defendants The Boxing Hall of Fame, Inc. and Steven Lott accepted service of the Summons and Complaint through their counsel on November 1, 2017. By stipulation and order submitted on November 6, 2017 (ECF No. 11), the parties agreed that Defendants would answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Second Request] GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties as follows:. 1. Defendants The Boxing Hall of Fame, Inc. and Steven Lott accepted service of the Summons and Complaint through their counsel on November 1, 2017. By stipulation and order submitted on November 6, 2017 (ECF No. 11), the parties agreed that Defendants would answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Second Request]
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties as follows:.
1. Defendants The Boxing Hall of Fame, Inc. and Steven Lott accepted service of the Summons and Complaint through their counsel on November 1, 2017. By stipulation and order submitted on November 6, 2017 (ECF No. 11), the parties agreed that Defendants would answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before November 30, 2017.
2. The parties have engaged in settlement negotiations and wish to further extend the time to respond to the Complaint to allow those negotiations to continue and agree that it is in the interest of judicial efficiency and avoids the unnecessary accumulation of costs and fees to extend the date to respond to the Complaint.
3. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before January 19, 2018.
4. This is the second request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
