Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Highland Ranch Homeowners Association, 3:16-cv-00154-MMD-VPC. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171201d35 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR BANK OF AMERICA TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 37) (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP ( BANA ), and Defendants Highland Ranch Homeowners Association ( Highland Ranch ), LVDG LLC Series 141 a/k/a LVDG Series 141 ( LVDG ), and Thunder Properties, Inc. ( Thunder Pr
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR BANK OF AMERICA TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 37)

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (BANA), and Defendants Highland Ranch Homeowners Association (Highland Ranch), LVDG LLC Series 141 a/k/a LVDG Series 141 (LVDG), and Thunder Properties, Inc. (Thunder Properties), stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On October 30, 2017, BANA filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (motion). [ECF #37.] Defendants' responses were due on November 20, 2017.

2. Highland Ranch filed its opposition to the motion on November 20, 2017. [ECF #40.] The Court set BANA's deadline to file a reply to Highland Ranch's opposition as December 4, 2017.

3. On November 21, 2017, the Court granted a stipulation for extension of time entered into between BANA, LVDG and Thunder Properties allowing LVDG and Thunder Properties to file their response(s) to the motion by December 8, 2017. [ECF #41.]

4. Based on the foregoing, the parties agree BANA shall have until December 22, 2017 to file a reply to the oppositions of Highland Ranch, LVDG, and Thunder Properties.

5. This is BANA's first request for an extension of this deadline and is not being made for the purpose of delay. The parties request the additional time so BANA may file a reply to the oppositions in a coordinated manner and to save judicial resources.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer