Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Selene Finance, L.P. v. Sunrise Highlands Community Association, 2:16-cv-02521-KJD-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171204c32
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Selene Finance L.P., SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC ( SFR ) and The Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master Association ( HOA ) stipulate as follows: 1. The parties recently submitted a proposed stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for the pending motions for summary judgment on October 18, 2017. [ECF No. 47]. However, the parties seek an additional extension. 2. SFR f
More

ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Selene Finance L.P., SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC (SFR) and The Foothills at MacDonald Ranch Master Association (HOA) stipulate as follows:

1. The parties recently submitted a proposed stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for the pending motions for summary judgment on October 18, 2017. [ECF No. 47]. However, the parties seek an additional extension.

2. SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on September 13, 2017. [ECF No. 41]. The parties previously requested that the deadline to respond to SFR's Motion be continued to November 15, 2017.

3. Selene filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on September 13, 2017. [ECF No. 42]. The parties previously requested that the deadline to respond to Selene's Motion be continued to November 15, 2017.

4. Sunrise filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on September 13, 2017. [ECF No. 43]. The parties previously requested that the deadline to respond to Sunrise's Motion be continued to November 15, 2017.

5. The parties previously requested that the deadline to file any replies be continued to November 22, 2017.

6. The parties hereby stipulate and agree that any replies in support of SFR's Motion [ECF No. 41], Selene's Motion [ECF No. 42] and Sunrise's Motion [ECF No. 43] be filed on or before December 13, 2017.

7. This is the third request for an extension of these deadlines and is not made for purposes of delay. The additional time requested is to allow counsel to meaningfully respond to the arguments raised in each opposition.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer