Hurt v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, 2:17-cv-01122-JAD-CWH. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171204c40
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEUTSCHE BANK TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, Edward Hurt (hereinafter "Hurt"), by and through its attorney of record, Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. of the law firm of Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. LLC, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for IXIS Real Estate Capital Trust 2005-HE3 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE3 (hereinafter "
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEUTSCHE BANK TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, Edward Hurt (hereinafter "Hurt"), by and through its attorney of record, Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. of the law firm of Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. LLC, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for IXIS Real Estate Capital Trust 2005-HE3 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE3 (hereinafter "D..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEUTSCHE BANK TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, Edward Hurt (hereinafter "Hurt"), by and through its attorney of record, Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. of the law firm of Allison R. Schmidt, Esq. LLC, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for IXIS Real Estate Capital Trust 2005-HE3 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2005-HE3 (hereinafter "Deutsche Bank"), by and through its attorneys of record, Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq. and Lindsay D. Robbins, Esq. of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, that the parties agree to extend the deadline for Deutsche Bank to file its Response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint until January 3, 2018.
Counsel for Deutsche Bank requests additional time to respond to the Amended Complaint in order to review the additional allegations and voluminous exhibits. This is the parties' first request for an extension and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
