Garcia v. Service Employees International Union, 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171204c73
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION AND MOTIONS TO AMEND (ECF Nos. 60, 66, 94 in 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK and ECF No. 24 in 2:17-cv-02137-APG-NJK). ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Prior to these two cases being consolidated, the plaintiffs filed motions to amend in each of the separate cases. Following consolidation, the plaintiffs again move to amend. The parties filed a stipulation to extend the defendants' time to respond to this latest motion pending a ruling from me as to whether the latest
Summary: ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION AND MOTIONS TO AMEND (ECF Nos. 60, 66, 94 in 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK and ECF No. 24 in 2:17-cv-02137-APG-NJK). ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Prior to these two cases being consolidated, the plaintiffs filed motions to amend in each of the separate cases. Following consolidation, the plaintiffs again move to amend. The parties filed a stipulation to extend the defendants' time to respond to this latest motion pending a ruling from me as to whether the latest m..
More
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION AND MOTIONS TO AMEND
(ECF Nos. 60, 66, 94 in 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK and ECF No. 24 in 2:17-cv-02137-APG-NJK).
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Prior to these two cases being consolidated, the plaintiffs filed motions to amend in each of the separate cases. Following consolidation, the plaintiffs again move to amend. The parties filed a stipulation to extend the defendants' time to respond to this latest motion pending a ruling from me as to whether the latest motion to amend renders the prior motions moot.
The plaintiffs' motion to amend following consolidation renders its prior motions to amend moot. I therefore deny those motions, along with a related motion for leave to file a surreply. I grant the parties' stipulation to extend the defendants' deadline to respond to the motion to amend to 14 days from the date of this order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motions to amend (ECF No. 60 in 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK and ECF No. 24 in 2:17-cv-02137-APG-NJK) and the defendants' motion for leave to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 66) are DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 94) is GRANTED in that the defendants' response to the plaintiffs' motion to amend (ECF No. 92) is due 14 days from the date of this order.
Source: Leagle
