Federal National Mortgage Association v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6671 W. Tropicana 103, 2:17-cv-01758-RFB-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171205c13
Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed on June 26, 2017. Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6671 West Tropicana 103 filed its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) on October 11, 2017. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first d
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed on June 26, 2017. Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6671 West Tropicana 103 filed its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) on October 11, 2017. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first de..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed on June 26, 2017. Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6671 West Tropicana 103 filed its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) on October 11, 2017. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than December 11, 2017 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Source: Leagle
