Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Allstate Insurance Company v. Belsky, 2:15-cv-02265-MMD-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171208f22 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (collectively, the "Allstate Parties"), and Defendants/Counterclaimants MARJORIE BELSKY, M.D., MARIO TARQUINO, M.D., MARJORIE BELSKY, M.D.,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Second Request)

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (collectively, the "Allstate Parties"), and Defendants/Counterclaimants MARJORIE BELSKY, M.D., MARIO TARQUINO, M.D., MARJORIE BELSKY, M.D., INC. d/b/a INTEGRATED PAIN SPECIALISTS, and MARIO TARQUINO, M.D., INC. (collectively, the "Belsky/Tarquino Parties"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On October 17, 2017, the Belsky/Tarquino Parties filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Hearing Requested) [ECF No. 222] (the "Motion");

2. On November 22, 2017, the Allstate Parties filed their Opposition to the Motion [ECF No. 242];

3. Pursuant to the October 30, 2017 Order [ECF No. 228], the Belsky/Tarquino Parties presently have until December 8, 2017 to file their Reply in Support of the Motion;

4. In order to accommodate scheduling conflicts for the Belsky/Tarquino Parties' counsel, and due to ongoing efforts by the Belsky/Tarquino Parties related to reviewing the Allstate Parties' supplemental discovery responses, the Belsky/Tarquino Parties shall now have up to and including December 22, 2017 to file their Reply in Support of the Motion; and

5. This is the second stipulation for an extension of time to file the Reply in Support of the Motion. This stipulation is made in good faith and not to delay the proceedings.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer