Belsher v. Pescio, 3:17-cv-00589-LRH-(WGC). (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171212597
Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 15, 2017 (ECF No. 8), with responses due November 29, 2017. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), the parties stipulate and agree good cause exists to enlarge the time for response in that we have intervening holidays and the Motion will require additional legal research. The parties agree to a new due date for responses as December 29, 2017. ORDER IT IS SO ORDER
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 15, 2017 (ECF No. 8), with responses due November 29, 2017. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), the parties stipulate and agree good cause exists to enlarge the time for response in that we have intervening holidays and the Motion will require additional legal research. The parties agree to a new due date for responses as December 29, 2017. ORDER IT IS SO ORDERE..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
(FIRST REQUEST)
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 15, 2017 (ECF No. 8), with responses due November 29, 2017. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), the parties stipulate and agree good cause exists to enlarge the time for response in that we have intervening holidays and the Motion will require additional legal research. The parties agree to a new due date for responses as December 29, 2017.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
