Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert A. Slovak vs Golf Course Villas Homeowners Association,, 3:13-cv-569-RJC-VPC. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171214a22 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (First Request) VALERIE P. COOKE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1 and LR 7-1 this Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (First Request) is entered into between Plaintiff, Robert A. Slovak (Plaintiff) and Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. ("Wells Fargo") t
More

Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement

(First Request)

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1 and LR 7-1 this Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (First Request) is entered into between Plaintiff, Robert A. Slovak (Plaintiff) and Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. ("Wells Fargo") through their attorneys, based on the following:

1. Plaintiff filed a Motion to File Under Seal Motion to Enforce Settlement [ECF #155] and Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (The Motion) on September 2, 2017.

2. Wells Fargo sought extensions of time to file their Response due to a variety or Circumstance which were laid out in their Third Request for Extension of Time.

3. When the Third Extension to file the Response was agreed to by Plaintiff's Counsel, he did not realize that his client was going to be out of the Country when the date for the Reply to the Response was set.

4. Counsel for the Plaintiff only recently received correspondence from his Client requesting time to review the Response and discuss same with his Counsel.

5. Counsel for Defendant and Counsel for Plaintiff have therefore agreed to a two-week extension for Plaintiff to file his Reply. Plaintiff's Reply will be due on or before December 15, 2017.

NOW THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, the parties agree as follows:

1. Plaintiff shall have until December 15, 2017 to file a Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer