Comarova v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02611-GMN-VPC. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171215d28
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall be granted a thirty-day extension from the current December 18, 2017 deadline to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint. This is Defendant's first request for an extension. There is good cause for this extension because Defendant is in the process of compiling the certified adminis
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall be granted a thirty-day extension from the current December 18, 2017 deadline to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint. This is Defendant's first request for an extension. There is good cause for this extension because Defendant is in the process of compiling the certified administ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A THIRTY-DAY EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
The parties stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall be granted a thirty-day extension from the current December 18, 2017 deadline to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint. This is Defendant's first request for an extension. There is good cause for this extension because Defendant is in the process of compiling the certified administrative record to file with the answer. Therefore, the parties jointly request an extension up to and including January 17, 2018.
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
