Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ochs v. Gentry, 2:16-cv-00982-JCM-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171220f27 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Petitioner has filed an amended petition (ECF No. 18). The court has reviewed it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The court will direct respondents to file a response. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the amended petition (ECF No. 18). Respondents shall raise all potential af
More

ORDER

Petitioner has filed an amended petition (ECF No. 18). The court has reviewed it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The court will direct respondents to file a response.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the amended petition (ECF No. 18). Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. If respondents file a motion, then the briefing schedule of Local Rule LR 7-2 shall apply.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer