Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Tucker, 2:17-cr-337-RFB-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171220f42 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DETERMINATION OF MENTAL COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . CERTIFICATION: This stipulation is timely filed under Title 18, United States Code Section 4241(a) 1 and the Court's December 8, 2017 Order reflected in the Minutes of Proceedings at ECF 31. STIPULATION The United States, by and through the Acting United States Attorney Steven W. Myhre and Assistant United States Attorney Daniel J. Cowhig, and the defendant TERENCE DEMARIUS
More

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DETERMINATION OF MENTAL COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL

CERTIFICATION: This stipulation is timely filed under Title 18, United States Code Section 4241(a)1 and the Court's December 8, 2017 Order reflected in the Minutes of Proceedings at ECF 31.

STIPULATION

The United States, by and through the Acting United States Attorney Steven W. Myhre and Assistant United States Attorney Daniel J. Cowhig, and the defendant TERENCE DEMARIUS TUCKER, by and through his counsel Assistant Federal Public Defender Raquel Lazo, jointly stipulate and move under Title 18, United States Code Section 4241(a) for a hearing to determine the mental competency of the defendant. The offense conduct alleged, the one hundred percent (100%) disability rating awarded to the defendant by the Department of Veterans' Affairs based upon specified mental health conditions, and the Department of Veterans' Affairs administrative determination that the defendant is not competent to manage his own financial affairs give the attorney for the United States and the counsel for defendant TUCKER "reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense." 18 U.S.C. 4241(a).

The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the Court should designate Dr. Lisa Foerster, Psy. D., of Clark County, Nevada, to perform the evaluation ordered. While Dr. Foerster has not previously performed competency evaluations in Federal criminal matters, she has performed numerous evaluations for State courts in both criminal and civil matters. Dr. Foerster's Curriculm Vitae is enclosed at Attachment A. The parties stipulate to Dr. Foerster's qualification as an expert witness before the Court for the purposes of this competency evaluation under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).

The parties note that the necessary government contracting arrangements to retain Dr. Foerster will result in a delay of two to four weeks before she will be able to perform the ordered evaluation.

POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Under Title 18, United States Code Section 4241(a), the Court shall grant a motion for a hearing to determine the mental competency of the defendant if there is "reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense." Id.

Under Title 18, United States Code Section 4241(b), "[p]rior to the date of the hearing, the Court may order that a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant be conducted, and that a psychiatric or psychological report be filed with the Court, pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(b) and (c)."

RELIEF REQUESTED

The parties jointly ask this Honorable Court to order a hearing under Title 18, United States Code, Section 4241(a) to determine the mental competency of the defendant. Prior to that hearing, the parties ask this Honorable Court to order a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant to determine whether the defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense. The parties request that the Honorable Court designate Dr. Lisa Foerster, Psy. D., of Clark County, Nevada, to perform the evaluation ordered.

As a result of this stipulation, the parties ask that this Honorable Court grant in part the Government's submitted Motion for Determination of Mental Competency to Stand Trial at ECF 30 as reflected in this stipulation. The parties further request that this Honorable Court vacate the hearing regarding the Government's motion at ECF 30 set for Friday, December 22, 2017, the order that government counsel have a representative from the Bureau of Prisons appear telephonically at that hearing, and the order that the defendant's response to the Government motion due Monday, December 18, 2017, all set forth in the Minutes of Proceedings at ECF 31.cker

PROPOSED ORDER

The parties have filed a stipulation and agreement under Title 18, United States Code Section 4241(a) seeking a hearing to determine the mental competency of the defendant.

I find that there is "reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense." 18 U.S.C. 4241(a).

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Court will hold a hearing to determine the mental competency of defendant TERENCE DEMARIUS TUCKER at a date and time to be determined.

2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. §§ 4241 and 4247, I order that prior to that hearing the defendant TERENCE DEMARIUS TUCKER undergo a psychiatric or psychological evaluation to determine whether defendant TUCKER is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense.

3. The examination conducted pursuant to this order shall be conducted by one or more licensed or certified psychiatrists or clinical psychologists. 18 U.S.C. § 4247(b). I hereby designate Dr. Lisa Foerster, Psy. D., of Clark County, Nevada, to conduct this examination.

4. A psychiatric or psychological report shall be prepared by the examiner designated to conduct the psychiatric or psychological examination. The person designated to conduct the psychiatric or psychological examination shall file the report, under seal, with the court and provide copies to the Assistant United States Attorney and the Assistant Federal Public Defender in this case.

5. The report shall include:

a. The defendant's history and present symptoms;

b. A description of the psychiatric, psychological or medical tests that were employed and their results;

c. The examiner's findings; and

d. The examiner's opinions concerning whether the defendant is suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him, or to assist properly in his defense.

The Court finds that the time required to carry out the above-described psychiatric or psychological examination of defendant TUCKER and the Court's determination of the defendant's competency to stand trial is excludable time under the United States Constitution, the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A), and Rule 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall hold a status hearing on this matter when the Court has received the completed psychiatric or psychological report under seal,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government's submitted Motion for Determination of Mental Competency to Stand Trial at ECF 30 is hereby GRANTED IN PART as reflected in this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing regarding the Government's submitted motion at ECF 30 for psychiatric evaluation and competency determination set for Friday, December 22, 2017, the order that government counsel have a representative from the Bureau of Prisons appear telephonically at that hearing, and the order that the defendant's response to the Government motion be due Monday, December 18, 2017, all set forth in the Minutes of Proceedings at ECF 31, are hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. "[A]t any time after the commencement of a prosecution ... the Government may file motion for a hearing to determine the mental competency of the defendant."
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer