Armstrong v. Reynolds, 2:17-cv-02528-APG-CWH. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20171221e52
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Defendants TERRY REYNOLDS, Deputy Director of Nevada division of Business and Industry; STEVE GEORGE, Administrator of the Nevada Division of Industrial Relations; JESS LANKFORD, Chief Administrative Officer of Nevada OSHA; and LARA PELLEGRINI, Whistleblower Chief Investigator of Nevada OSHA, by and through their counsel, Ada
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Defendants TERRY REYNOLDS, Deputy Director of Nevada division of Business and Industry; STEVE GEORGE, Administrator of the Nevada Division of Industrial Relations; JESS LANKFORD, Chief Administrative Officer of Nevada OSHA; and LARA PELLEGRINI, Whistleblower Chief Investigator of Nevada OSHA, by and through their counsel, Adam..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
(First Request)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Defendants TERRY REYNOLDS, Deputy Director of Nevada division of Business and Industry; STEVE GEORGE, Administrator of the Nevada Division of Industrial Relations; JESS LANKFORD, Chief Administrative Officer of Nevada OSHA; and LARA PELLEGRINI, Whistleblower Chief Investigator of Nevada OSHA, by and through their counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General, and Deputy Attorney General Vivienne Rakowsky, and Plaintiff HELEN ARMSTRONG, by and through her counsel, Joel F. Hansen of Cooper Levenson, P.A., that due to the fact that the Plaintiff's attorney, Joel F. Hansen, Esq. has been suffering from continuing back pain, that the parties stipulate that Plaintiff shall have until January 19, 2018 to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
Good cause exists to continue the date for the Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss due to Plaintiff's attorney, Joel F. Hansen, suffering from back pain and this is why the stipulation is entered into this 19th day of December, 2017.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
