Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Turner v. Baker, 3:17-cv-00139-MMD-WGC. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171222h15 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . In this habeas corpus action, on October 17, 2017, the Court granted petitioner Jeremy Turner's motion for leave to amend his petition (ECF No. 26), and then Turner filed his amended petition on December 18, 2017 (ECF No. 27). The Court will, therefore, set a schedule for further proceedings. It is ordered that respondents will have ninety (90) days from the date of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the amended habeas petition (ECF No. 27).
More

ORDER

In this habeas corpus action, on October 17, 2017, the Court granted petitioner Jeremy Turner's motion for leave to amend his petition (ECF No. 26), and then Turner filed his amended petition on December 18, 2017 (ECF No. 27). The Court will, therefore, set a schedule for further proceedings.

It is ordered that respondents will have ninety (90) days from the date of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the amended habeas petition (ECF No. 27).

In all other respects the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered April 4, 2017 (ECF No. 5), will remain in effect: if respondents file an answer, petitioner will have sixty (60) days to file a reply to the answer. If respondents file a motion to dismiss, petitioner will have sixty (60) days to file a response to the motion to dismiss, and then respondents will have thirty (30) days to file a reply to petitioner's response.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer