Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 3:17-CV-00444-RCJ-WGC. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171228955 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS (First Request) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties specifically identified herein, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to LR IA 6-1, that Defendants CROWN CASTLE ("Crown"); VERIZON WIRELESS INC. ("Verizon"); TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, JOHN MARSHALL, BRIDGET CORNELL, JOANNE MARCHETTA, JIM BAETGE, JAMES LAWRE
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITIONS TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS

(First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties specifically identified herein, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to LR IA 6-1, that Defendants CROWN CASTLE ("Crown"); VERIZON WIRELESS INC. ("Verizon"); TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, JOHN MARSHALL, BRIDGET CORNELL, JOANNE MARCHETTA, JIM BAETGE, JAMES LAWRENCE, BILL YEATES, SHELLY ALDEAN, MARSHA BERKBIGLER, CASEY BEYER, TIMOTHY CASHMAN, BELINDA FAUSTINOS, TIM CARLSON, AUSTIN SASS, NANCY McDERMID, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, MARK BRUCE, SUE NOVASEL, LARRY SEVISON, and E. CLEMENT SHUTE, JR. (collectively, the "TRPA Defendants"), shall have until and including Friday, January 12, 2018, to file their respective Reply briefs to Plaintiff's Oppositions to TRPA's Motion to Dismiss and Crown and Verizon's Joinder thereto with Additional and Supplemental Points and Authorities.

Specifically, and for clarification, the TRPA Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss in this matter (ECF No. 17), to which Plaintiff filed his Opposition (ECF No. 38) on December 8, 2017. Crown and Verizon filed their Joinder to TRPA Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, along with Additional and Supplemental Points and Authorities in support of dismissal (ECF No. 23), to which Plaintiff filed his Opposition (ECF No. 39), also on December 8, 2017. The parties to this Stipulation now agree that the Reply briefs from TRPA Defendants and Crown/Verizon in response to Plaintiff's Oppositions (ECF Nos. 38 and 39) shall now be due for filing on or before Friday, January 12, 2018.

This extension was agreed among the parties specifically identified herein to accommodate the pending winter holidays and due to at least one counsel's holiday travel through January 5, 2018. This is the referenced Defendants' first request for an extension of time to file and serve their respective Reply briefs to Plaintiff's Oppositions (ECF Nos. 38 and 39).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer