Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Banner v. Las Vegas Metropolitian Police Department, 2:16-cv-1717-RFB-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171229a04 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ECF NOS. [48], [49], [50], [51], AND [52] SECOND REQUEST RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadlines to respond to Defendants' motions for summary judgment (See ECF No.s [48-52]) in the above-captioned case fourteen (14) days, up to
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ECF NOS. [48], [49], [50], [51], AND [52]

SECOND REQUEST

Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadlines to respond to Defendants' motions for summary judgment (See ECF No.s [48-52]) in the above-captioned case fourteen (14) days, up to and including January 10, 2016.

This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay. This request for extension is based upon the following:

Due to the New Year Holiday, Counsel for the parties have met and conferred and agreed that, to best serve the interests of the parties the most efficient remedy is to reasonably extend the Plaintiff's deadline to respond and for Defendants to file replies.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the time for the Plaintiff to file his responses to the Defendants' motions for summary judgment — ECF No.s [48], [49], [50], [51], and [52] by fourteen (14) days from the current deadline of December 27, 2017 up to and including January 10th, 2018.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court also extend the time, or otherwise allow time, for the Defendants to file replies in accordance with the extension of the Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' motions for summary judgment.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer