Filed: Dec. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Third Request JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC ("SFR"), U.S. BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO LASALLE BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, WMALT SERIES 2005-10 ("Bank"), and SHERMAN OAKS ESTATES OWNERS ASSOCIATION ("Sherman Oaks"), by and through their respect
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Third Request JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC ("SFR"), U.S. BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO LASALLE BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, WMALT SERIES 2005-10 ("Bank"), and SHERMAN OAKS ESTATES OWNERS ASSOCIATION ("Sherman Oaks"), by and through their respecti..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Third Request
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC ("SFR"), U.S. BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO LASALLE BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF THE WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, WMALT SERIES 2005-10 ("Bank"), and SHERMAN OAKS ESTATES OWNERS ASSOCIATION ("Sherman Oaks"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on November 7, 2017. [ECF No. 66]. Any response was originally due on November 28, 2017.
2. The Bank requested two extensions of time to respond to SFR's MSJ, which was stipulated to and granted on November 28, 2017 [ECF No. 68] and December 8, 2017 [ECF No. 70]. Based thereon, the Bank filed its Opposition to SFR's MSJ on December 15, 2017.
3. SFR's Reply in Support of its MSJ is currently due December 29, 2017. Given the holidays, staffing issues, and compounding work schedule, SFR seeks an extension of this deadline to allow sufficient time to respond to the Bank's Opposition.
4. The parties hereby stipulate and agree that SFR shall have until January 12, 2018 to file its Reply in Support of its MSJ.
5. This is the third request for an extension of these deadlines and it is not made for the purposes of delay. The additional time requested is to allow counsel to meaningfully respond to the arguments raised in each motion.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
